Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(3): 588-593, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35113739

RESUMEN

Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains a frequently utilized agent in the emergency department (ED) for management of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). While various protocols of UFH dosing have been proposed for patients with obesity, the optimal dosing and monitoring strategy is unclear. Objective: This study aims to compare the time to the first therapeutic anti-Xa level in obese acute VTE patients following the use of either total body weight (TBW) or adjusted body weight-based (AdjBW) dosing of UFH in the ED, and to analyze the impact of different dosing strategies on patient outcomes. Methods: Inclusion criteria included adult patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2, and suspected VTE managed with UFH per institutional protocol utilizing a bolus dose followed by maintenance infusion and anti-Xa monitoring. The primary outcome was time to the first therapeutic anti-Xa level in the group dosed per TBW compared with the group dosed per AdjBW. Safety outcomes included incidence of bleeding events, protamine administration, and mortality. Results: There were 32 patients included in the study. Patients dosed per TBW achieved a median time to first therapeutic anti-Xa level of 14.5 hours compared with 15 hours in the AdjBW group (P = .613). The median therapeutic UFH infusion rate was 16 units/kg/hr in the TBW group compared with 13.5 units/kg/hr in the AdjBW group (P < .001). Safety outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: Patients presenting to the ED with acute VTE may be managed with UFH using either a TBW or AdjBW dosing strategy.


Asunto(s)
Heparina , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Acad Emerg Med ; 26(12): 1311-1325, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31742823

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite increased focus on opioid prescribing, little is known about the influence of prescription opioid medication information given to patients in the emergency department (ED). The study objective was to evaluate the effect of an Electronic Medication Complete Communication (EMC2 ) Opioid Strategy on patients' safe use of opioids and knowledge about opioids. METHODS: This was a three-arm prospective, randomized controlled pragmatic trial with randomization occurring at the physician level. Consecutive discharged patients at an urban academic ED (>88,000 visits) with new hydrocodone-acetaminophen prescriptions received one of three care pathways: 1) usual care, 2) EMC2 intervention, or 3) EMC2  + short message service (SMS) text messaging. The ED EMC2 intervention triggered two patient-facing educational tools (MedSheet, literacy-appropriate prescription wording [Take-Wait-Stop]) and three provider-facing reminders to counsel (directed to ED physician, dispensing pharmacist, follow-up physician). Patients in the EMC2  + SMS arm additionally received one text message/day for 1 week. Follow-up at 1 to 2 weeks assessed "demonstrated safe use" (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes including patient knowledge and actual safe use (via medication diaries) were assessed 2 to 4 days and 1 month following enrollment. RESULTS: Among the 652 enrolled, 343 completed follow-up (57% women; mean ± SD age = 42 ± 14.0 years). Demonstrated safe opioid use occurred more often in the EMC2 group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 5.06), but not the EMC2  + SMS group (aOR = 1.87, 95% CI = 0.90 to 3.90) compared with usual care. Neither intervention arm improved medication safe use as measured by medication diary data. Medication knowledge, measured by a 10-point composite knowledge score, was greater in the EMC2  + SMS group (ß = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.09 to 1.06) than usual care. CONCLUSIONS: The study found that the EMC2 tools improved demonstrated safe dosing, but these benefits did not translate into actual use based on medication dairies. The text-messaging intervention did result in improved patient knowledge.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Hidrocodona/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistemas Recordatorios/instrumentación , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto
3.
J Emerg Med ; 53(6): 896-903, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28941557

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although pharmacists commonly provide patient education and help manage high-risk anticoagulant medications in inpatient and outpatient settings, the evidence for these interventions in the emergency department (ED) is less established, especially in the era of direct-acting oral anticoagulants. In 2013, a formal program was initiated whereby patients discharged with a new prescription for any anticoagulant receive education from an ED pharmacist when on-site. In addition, they received follow-up phone calls from an ED pharmacist within 72 hours of discharge. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the impact of pharmacist education, defined as the need for intervention on callback, versus physician and nursing-driven discharge measures on patient understanding and appropriate use of anticoagulant medications. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis included patients discharged from the ED between May 2013 and May 2016 with a new anticoagulant prescription. Electronic callback records were reviewed to assess patients' adherence and understanding of discharge instructions as well as for an anticoagulant-related hospital readmission within 90 days. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four patients were evaluated in a per protocol analysis. Patients who did not receive pharmacist education prior to discharge required an increased need for intervention during callback versus those who did (36.4% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.0005) related to adherence, inappropriate administration, and continued use of interacting medications or supplements, among other concerns. In addition, patients who had not received pharmacist counseling were more likely to be readmitted to a hospital or return to the ED within 90 days after their initial visit for an anticoagulation-related problem versus patients who had (12.12% vs. 1.85%, p = 0.0069). CONCLUSION: Discharge education by ED pharmacists leads to improved patient understanding and appropriate use of anticoagulants.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/farmacología , Chicago , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol Profesional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/organización & administración , Recursos Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...